Results & quality
Feedback: you said, we did
Feedback from users, reviewers and customers with the action taken and its status.
You said, we did
- Evidence for price variances is hard to read. → Side-by-side PO / invoice / clause view added to the HITL panel.
- Draft replies sound too formal. → Tone-of-voice rules updated with the brand team; evaluation re-run.
- Ownership charts are missing for complex structures. → Ownership graph tool in design (Q1 27).
- Waiting for a human after the bot is frustrating. → Hand-off SLA set to 2 minutes; queue visible to the customer.
- Alerts do not say which guardrail fired. → Guardrail ID and trace link added to every alert.
Public demo with fictional data (Example Group). © 2025–2026 Russo-Got Marius Mihail & PIR2-IT. All rights reserved.
More in this demo
- Executive dashboard
- Executive summary generator
- Portfolio: idea → retire
- Policy register
- Governance & gates
- RACI
- Guardrails catalogue
- Risk register
- Complexity & costs
- AI maturity assessment
- Assessment & reuse: HW, licences, comms
- CAPEX / OPEX & optimised roadmap
- V&V
- Animated roadmap
- Methodology, SDLC & gates
- Change management
- Document templates
- Client onboarding
- Reference architecture
- AI engines & model choice
- Training on institutional culture
- Agentic workflow & HITL
- Hallucination control
- AI security & threats
- Operations dashboard
- Incidents & service desk
- FinOps
- rBMS
- Client satisfaction
- Lessons learned
- e-Learning
- Wiki
- Community of practice
- Nomenclator EN/FR
- Ask the advisor